Articles Tagged with consumer protection attorney

We are now slightly more than a month in to the Trump presidency, and Democrats are already gearing up for the next election, setting their sights on the next mid-term. However, if they want to prevail, they are first going to have to acknowledge and accept that the Obama administration did not oversee a golden era of financial and economic policies – no matter what kind of challenges he inherited.miami

The reality is Obama had many opportunities to help those in the working class, and he repeatedly declined to seize them.

The two main areas to which we refer:

  • Obama’s handling of the foreclosure crisis/ subsequent bank bailouts. The end result of the policies adhered to on these fronts resulted in concentrated financial power, rather than support of the American middle class.
  • Enactment of pro-monopoly policies. This approach crushed rural area economies, so it was unsurprising many of those voters – even those who had previously voted for Obama – swung to the side of Donald Trump.

Continue reading

A company that promises to protect consumers from identity theft has been accused of violating a federal court order that requires it to keep those promises and refrain from deceptive advertising. lock

The case against LifeLock dates back several years, but now,  the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announces LifeLock has agreed to a $113 million settlement in the matter – the largest monetary award ever wrangled by the commission in an enforcement action.

The FTC first took action against the firm five years ago, when it alleged in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona that the company didn’t deliver on advertising claims promoting its identity theft services. The firm vows to keep consumers’ sensitive personal information shielded from thieves. But the FTC alleges the company failed to provide the kind of protection it promised, meaning it misled consumers with advertising that was deceptive. Continue reading

The U.S. Senate recently took one major step toward protecting the rights of consumers and the integrity of capitalism in the 21st Century with its passage of the Consumer Review Freedom Act (S. 2044, H.R. 2110). The bill targets so-called “gag clauses” or “non-disparagement agreements,” which some companies use to curb criticism online.enterkey

Although many companies have argued that competitors or others are unfairly using online tools to spread falsehoods or maliciously damaging their reputation without cause, the flip side is that consumers have been penalized thousands of dollars for posting negative – but honest – online reviews. These reviews are widely used by prospective customers to determine whether to buy a service or patronize a location, so there is a lot at stake on both sides.

These dubious non-disparagement clauses are often tucked into the fine print of the purchase agreement, and have been found on even the most seemingly inane purchases, such as cellphone accessories. Others have been found in rental agreements with landlords, wedding contractors or sellers of weight loss products. Continue reading